Site Health
Your site · Applicable SEO checks passed
View issues and fixesFind out whether your llms.txt is ready for AI tools. Check a live file by its address, paste the contents or open it from your computer, and get a Crawllyt quality score with a plain-English fix for each item.
The score is Crawllyt’s own quality measure. Apart from the title line, the checks are recommendations rather than formal rules.
The llms.txt proposal is short: it asks for a title on the first line and suggests a summary, sections and annotated links. Crawllyt turns those suggestions into seven practical checks and adds two of its own, links that actually work and a length that suits an index file, for nine checks in total.
Paste the contents or open the file from your computer to check a draft before you publish it. Opened files are read by your browser and are not stored by Crawllyt.
At the root of your domain, for example https://example.com/llms.txt. Files in a subfolder can still be checked, but AI tools usually look at the root first.
The first line with text must start with "# " followed by your site or project name. Move any other text below it.
Some websites block automated requests or respond slowly. These links are not counted as broken; open them in your browser to confirm they work.
No. The score measures how clear and correct your file is. Each AI company decides whether and how it reads llms.txt.
Yes. Enter any public website address to review how other sites structure their file.
Real page checks. Affected URLs. Clear next steps.
Your report will show every check, including passed checks and items requiring manual verification. No scores are shown until a website has been fetched successfully.
Your site · Applicable SEO checks passed
View issues and fixesObserved page signals, not measured AI rankings
How it worksAnalysed pages blocked by robots.txt
View robots.txt rulesGoogle-Extended controls AI usage, not Google Search indexing.
Affected occurrences across checked pages
Expand any row for affected items and instructions. “Review” means the result needs context or cannot be confirmed by a public scan.
Pagination also applies to the tracking, schema and checked-link tables below. Internal links count all occurrences; unique destinations are shown separately.
| Analysed URL | Title / length | Meta description / length | Headings & images | Internal links |
|---|
| Page | Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Search Console meta |
|---|
Detected IDs do not confirm that tracking fires correctly. No meta tag does not mean Search Console is unverified: DNS, files and other methods may be used.
AI readiness v2 weights ten observed signals: indexability (15), main heading (10), section structure (10), title (10), summary (10), valid structured data (10), visible content (15), language (5), descriptive internal links (10) and image alt attributes (5). Content and link checks allow partial credit. Thresholds are editorial tool guidelines, not search requirements. A score of 100 means all checklist points were met, not guaranteed AI citations.
GEO averages three observed signals: a question/FAQ heading, a recognised entity schema type, and a descriptive internal link. Scores do not measure AI rankings, citation probability, factual accuracy or content authority. llms.txt and tracking codes do not affect these scores.
SEO score is the percentage of applicable on-page/technical check categories passed. Manual-review checks, contextual “few links” checks and redirects are excluded. It is not a SEMrush or Google score. Character targets are your configured editorial guidelines.
Google AI features guidance · Search Console ownership verification
| Requested URL | Status | Final destination / detail |
|---|
Bounded sample audit, not an exhaustive site crawl. External scripts, consent flows and JavaScript-rendered content are not executed. Blocked sites are reported without invented scores.